🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 534+ reviews
Vintage āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

Ferragamo Keyring

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.2 out of 5(534 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$36.38
$60.63
Sale
āœ“ complimentary delivery on this item • Limited time offer

The item itself has minor scratches and dullness from storage, but nothing major, so I've listed it as no noticeable scratches or stains.There is a stain on the inside of the box (see photo 7).-F

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery

ā†©ļø
effortless Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Ferragamo Keyring

The item itself has minor scratches and dullness from storage, but nothing major, so I've listed it as "no noticeable scratches or stains."
There is a stain on the inside of the box (see photo 7).






-F

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2174110

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Keychains

Original Price: $60.63 USD

Sale Price: $36.38 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

āœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 534 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed
In daily use, the Ferragamo Keyring works fine and I’m satisfied. Arrived on time.
SM
Sarah Miller āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific Ferragamo Keyring!
Good build and relaxing use Ferragamo Keyring.
BT
Brittany Turner āœ“ Verified
1 month ago​
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
remarkable Ferragamo Keyring!
cherish the design and quality of this Ferragamo Keyring.
RS
Rachel Scott āœ“ Verified​
3 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
superb Value for Money
From my experience, the Ferragamo Keyring is practical so I’m okay with it.
AC
Amber Carter āœ“ Verified
1 week ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
splendid Ferragamo Keyring!​
The Ferragamo Keyring was slightly smaller than I expected, but still usable.